<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuart Chandler Dead? Say It Isn&#8217;t So!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/</link>
	<description>Life&#039;s guiltiest of pleasures: soap operas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimi</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>&amp; that should&#039;ve read above:
... for us to LOSE David Canary completely over a money dispute.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#038; that should&#8217;ve read above:<br />
&#8230; for us to LOSE David Canary completely over a money dispute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimi</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>I was actually hoping that Ryan was the one to go ....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was actually hoping that Ryan was the one to go &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimi</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>I also heard about the pay cut.  But you know as much as I loved Stuart, I&#039;d rather them cut the character than for us to love David Canary completely over a money dispute.
I&#039;m really enjoying DC&#039;s portrayal of Adam after Stuart&#039;s death as well.  Can&#039;t wait to find out why he&#039;s so into Annie.
Stuart will be missed tho, big time!  He may not have gotten a lotta airtime but whenever he graced the screen I was happy to see him!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also heard about the pay cut.  But you know as much as I loved Stuart, I&#8217;d rather them cut the character than for us to love David Canary completely over a money dispute.<br />
I&#8217;m really enjoying DC&#8217;s portrayal of Adam after Stuart&#8217;s death as well.  Can&#8217;t wait to find out why he&#8217;s so into Annie.<br />
Stuart will be missed tho, big time!  He may not have gotten a lotta airtime but whenever he graced the screen I was happy to see him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1069</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1069</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
I had read speculation about that as well.
But Stuart hasn&#039;t had a great deal of airtime in the past few years that I&#039;m not sure the extra pay would have made that big of a difference.
But it could be. I just don&#039;t know.
It&#039;s just such a shame because Stuart was such a beloved character.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
I had read speculation about that as well.<br />
But Stuart hasn&#8217;t had a great deal of airtime in the past few years that I&#8217;m not sure the extra pay would have made that big of a difference.<br />
But it could be. I just don&#8217;t know.<br />
It&#8217;s just such a shame because Stuart was such a beloved character.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisG</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1068</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1068</guid>
		<description>Times being tough, Canary was asked to take a pay cut. He agreed but said he would no longer play a dual role.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Times being tough, Canary was asked to take a pay cut. He agreed but said he would no longer play a dual role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuAnne C</title>
		<link>http://www.soapbox1.com/all-my-children/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>LuAnne C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 20:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.soapbox1.com/uncategorized/stuart-chandler-dead-say-it-isnt-so/#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>I agree. What was AMC thinking when they killed off Stewart? Normally GH ticks me off for getting rid of veterans, but this takes the cake!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. What was AMC thinking when they killed off Stewart? Normally GH ticks me off for getting rid of veterans, but this takes the cake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 443/464 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.soapbox1.com @ 2011-12-29 14:37:39 -->
